|
|
US Politics
Solving the Paradox of 2004: Why America Wanted Change but Voted for Continuity
Stan Greenberg and James CarvilleDemocracy Corps
Executive Summary
George Bush was re-elected on November 2nd by taking 51 percent of the
vote and by edging out John Kerry in the state of Ohio. Very important
things happened in this election to make Bush’s victory possible, but
support for the president’s approach to domestic and world affairs is
not one of them. The American electorate - including the 2000 voters we
sampled immediately after the election - wanted change, but settled for
the president. The president and his campaign acted boldly to create an
election dynamic that enabled Bush to escape the consequences of his
incumbency and the public’s desire for change. More important was the
attack on Kerry on abortion and gay marriage and the extreme cultural
polarization of the country. That proved effective at the end because
the president was able to keep the election centered on safety (the
terrorist threat) and values, rather than on Iraq and the stagnant
economy. Bush asked people to vote their beliefs and feelings, rather
than to judge his performance or ideas for the future. That is why
George Bush’s vote on Election Day exceeded his pre-election job
approval and exceeded his final poll numbers.
Methodology:
Democracy Corps conducted a national survey of 1,000 voters
November 2-3, 2004. We combined the data with 1,000 voters in a survey
conducted for the Institute for America’s Future on the same dates. The
two surveys shared several common questions such as issue concerns and
reasons to vote for the candidates, enabling us to look at large
sub-samples of the population.
Key Findings
- The biggest collection of doubts surrounding Bush (86%) centered
on his economic policies, big tax cuts for the wealthy, job losses and
outsourcing
-
For the Bush waverers,
the key swing group in the election, moral values were as important as
terrorism and national security, and critically, are followed by
concerns with the economy and jobs.
- The most striking feature of this election: the inverted
class election among white voters - the very best educated voted for
Kerry and the least educated voted for Bush
"In the end, Kerry was unable to make the economy a central point of
choice and change or break through with his vision for creating better
jobs with more affordable health care."
|